
Among the vital witnesses in the Karen Read murder retrial remained to indicate for a 3rd day Friday on the occasions bordering the fatality of Read’s partner, Boston policeman John O’Keefe, that was discovered less competent in the snow outside a Massachusetts home in 2022.
District attorneys declare, complying with an evening of alcohol consumption in Canton, that Read struck O’Keefe with her Lexus SUV beyond a party at an additional policeman’s home and left him to pass away in a snowstorm in January 2022. A postmortem examination discovered that the 46-year-old passed away of hypothermia and candid pressure injuries to the head.
After a court was not able to get to a judgment in the first murder test in 2014, Read is being retried on fees consisting of second-degree murder, automotive homicide while running a lorry drunk of alcohol and leaving the scene of a crash creating fatality. She has actually begged blameless and preserves her virtue.

Karen Read talks with her lawyers throughout her test at Norfolk Superior Court in Dedham, Mass., Might 2, 2025.
Mark Jarret Chavous/The Venture through AP
Jennifer McCabe, a pal of O’Keefe that had actually indicated throughout the very first test, required to the represent the 3rd day throughout the retrial on Friday in Dedham, Massachusetts.
In her substantial statement today, McCabe stated that she had actually participated in a celebration at a bar the evening prior to O’Keefe was discovered less competent in the snow with him, Check out and others. McCabe was likewise at the party complying with the event at bench at a home coming from her sibling and brother-in-law, a Boston policeman.
McCabe and an additional pal of O’Keefe’s– Kerry Roberts– an additional vital test witness that indicated recently– drove with Review a snowstorm to look for O’Keefe after he never ever got home the evening in the past, eventually discovering him outside McCabe’s sibling’s home less competent.
McCabe indicated Wednesday that while talking with a very first -responder at the scene, she listened to Read claim, “I struck him, I struck him, I struck him.”
Defense lawyer Alan Jackson smoked McCabe on her recollection of the occasions of that day and in the days, weeks, months and years after, highlighting incongruities in her different statements and versus authorities records.
In one circumstances, Jackson kept in mind that, after getting a phone call from O’Keefe’s niece and Check out that O’Keefe was missing out on, McCabe had actually called her sibling, though she did not point out that phone call while demonstrating the grand court that fingered Keep reading the homicide and murder fees.
” There’s absolutely nothing dubious,” McCabe stated regarding the phone call, affirming that her sibling did not address and she really did not keep in mind calling her.
Asked by Jackson on her use words “dubious,” McCabe stated, “There’s absolutely nothing regarding me calling my sibling that is dubious, and I seem like you’re insinuating it could be and it’s not.”

Witness Jen McCabe takes the stand at Norfolk Superior Court throughout the Karen Read test in Dedham, Mass., Might 2, 2025.
Mark Jarret Chavous/The Venture through AP
Jackson likewise wondered about McCabe regarding a busted taillight on Read’s SUV. McCabe indicated that Read initially discussed the damaged taillight in the morning phone call with O’Keefe’s niece, though Jackson stated that had not been consisted of in a cops record. McCabe waited her account.
When continued failing to remember specific information from that time, McCabe stated, “There are specific points I’ll always remember.”
Jackson’s interrogation likewise concentrated on McCabe’s Google look for how much time it requires to pass away in the cold. She indicated today that Read asked her to Google that after discovering O’Keefe in the snow, with the search made after 6 a.m. Though Jackson stated there is proof it was made at 2:27 a.m. that early morning, hours prior to O’Keefe was discovered. McCabe refuted she made the search at 2:27 a.m. and stated she browsed it later on that early morning, upon Read’s demand.
Jackson likewise declared that a team conversation consisting of McCabe and a number of member of the family revealed they were conspiring in the days complying with the fatality to collaborate their declarations, which McCabe refuted.
As he completed his interrogation, Jackson smoked McCabe on the minutes after they discovered O’Keefe in the snow outside her sibling’s home, and why she really did not run in to look at her sibling and brother-in-law.
” The factor you really did not go inside your house is since you understood far better,” he billed.
McCabe stated she had not been stressed since “something occurred on the front grass that had absolutely nothing to do with anything inside that home.”
” You weren’t fretted about them whatsoever since you understood what actually occurred, really did not you?” he responded to.
” Then, I really did not understand that he was struck by a lorry and there was taillight discovered beside him,” she reacted.

Alan Jackson, defense lawyer for Karen Read, inquiries witness Jen McCabe throughout Read’s test at Norfolk Superior Court in Dedham, Mass., Friday, Might 2, 2025.
Mark Jarret Chavous/AP
On re-direct, unique district attorney Hank Brennan examined McCabe on her mindset upon discovering O’Keefe.
” I was stunned, puzzled, worried, frightened, distressed– my pal was existing there on the ground, I really did not understand what occurred,” she stated.
On the Google search, McCabe verified that Read asked her to look how much time to pass away in the cool, which she had actually never ever tried that search prior to after that.
Brennan raised McCabe’s messages with Roberts later on that day, consisting of one in which Roberts texted, “I can not quit seeing him in the snow, Jen, this is dreadful.”
” Is your mindset collusion?” Brennan asked McCabe, to which she reacted, “No.”
McCabe has actually been disregarded as a witness. The test adjourned for the day, with a forensic researcher from the Massachusetts State Cops Criminal Offense Laboratory on the stand.
Complying with McCabe’s statement on Wednesday, Read declared McCabe was pushing the stand, claiming she never ever informed the witness to make a Google search that early morning.
” Every declaration’s various. Under vow. Not under vow,” she stated. “This is really comparable to what we saw a year earlier.”